Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Actions, Words, and Inaction

"Actions speak louder than words." Or as it is sometimes phrased, "What you do speaks so loud I can't hear a word you're saying!" This is certainly true of words and actions. If a husband says he loves his wife, but then goes out and has an affair with another woman his words are rather meaningless, aren't they.

Also, as we discussed a while back, words left unspoken can literally speak volumes. So, actions not taken can send a message too. Inaction sometimes speaks louder than words. This is especially true when it comes to leaders in a country or a community or a church body.

Luther talks about this in his Large Catechism in his discussion of the 8th Commandment. He writes,

"although no one has a right in his own person to judge and condemn anybody, yet if they to whose office it belongs fail to do it, they sin as well as he who would do so of his own accord, without such office. For here necessity requires one to speak of the evil, to prefer charges, to investigate and testify;

All this has been said regarding secret sins. But where the sin is quite public so that the judge and everybody know it, you can without any sin avoid him and let him go, because he has brought himself into disgrace, and you may also publicly testify concerning him. For when a matter is public in the light of day, there can be no slandering or false judging or testifying; as, when we now reprove the Pope with his doctrine, which is publicly set forth in books and proclaimed in all the world. For where the sin is public, the reproof also must be public, that every one may learn to guard against it."
(Large Catechism, Ten Commandments, paragraphs 274 & 284)

The "office" spoken of by Luther in the Large Catechism, is occupied by Pastors and elders in the congregation, and in our Synod's organizational structure, by the District Presidents who oversee matters within their districts. We [Intrepid Lutherans] have been encouraged by various individuals not to make assumption about the seeming inaction of various District Presidents concerning matters of public practice which are drawing our concern. We have been asked not to assume that nothing is being done, or not to assume that they agree with all that goes on in certain places in their Districts -- like RSO status of The Time of Grace, for example (which we have mentioned before on Intrepid Lutherans, here and here). OK, fair enough. We agree.

But by the same token, these same individuals, and others, must then also not assume we are out of line to ask, inquire, and encourage action against sectarian activities going on under the WELS banner. And, as long as we do not see any actual action being taken, we are very right and correct, according to Dr. Luther, to continue to ask, inquire, and urge action be taken. That too is only fair.

For just as actions can speak louder than words, and unspoken words speak volumes, so inaction can say a great deal too!

And That's The Way We See It

Pastor Spencer

8 comments:

Daniel Baker said...

Now this is an appropriate application of the 8th Commandment!

Anonymous said...

Pastor Spencer,
So, Intrepid Lutherans have been asked by "certain individuals" not to make assumptions as to Synodical leaders seeming inaction on certain subjects.
With all due respect to "certain individuals", what do they expect us to think?? How can I as a WELS layperson have confidence in my leaders when I see no action? Many of the "sectarian activities" have been going on for years. How long must I put up with "don't worry, we're handling it?"
Before I became a WELS layperson, I spent 24 years in the teaching ministry. Sorry, I've seen the 8th Commandment used as a shield for actions too many times. I say hold their feet to the fire!

Scott E. Jungen

Intrepid Lutherans said...

Daniel and Scott,

Thanks for your comments.

Of course it's an appropriate application of the 8th Commandment. It's right from Luther!

And yes, the 8th Commandment can certainly be misused. When that happens it too must be called out.

The first thing for us as a church body to do is to openly admit that we are not infallible; that we have made mistakes, and that we have problems of putting our otherwise correct doctrine into correct practice consistently. Once this admission is made and accepted, the real work of fixing our problems can begin.

Pastor Spencer

Anonymous said...

Great post. I'll just leave it at that and not go on a rant.

Christian Schulz

Daniel Gorman said...

"We have been asked not to assume that nothing is being done, or not to assume that they agree with all that goes on in certain places in their Districts -- like RSO status of The Time of Grace, for example (which we have mentioned before on Intrepid Lutherans, here and here). OK, fair enough." Pastor Spencer

Is Rev. Jeske being privately admonished? The question, of course, cannot be answered because the admonishment would then no longer be private. However, at some point, before Rev. Jeske and his congregation are asked and/or forced to leave, they must be given a public hearing where both sides can give testimony and hear a clear verdict. "For where the sin is public, the reproof also must be public, that every one may learn to guard against it." Large Catechism

Intrepid Lutherans said...

Excellent point Daniel!

We can tell you for a fact that Rev. Jeske is being "confronted." Whether it is "admonishment" or not, and how firm it is - that is another matter; one to which we cannot speak. The day will come when we can, at which time we will.

Pastor Spencer

Matthew Meyer said...

Sorry to go off-topic. This is something I've wondered about. Doesn't changing the Hymn of the Day for today to hymn 89 (rather than Luther's baptism hymn) exhibit sectarian behavior? Not to mention the supplemental lectionary? Don't we want to maintain our connection to the universal Church?

Rev. Paul A. Rydecki said...

Matthew,

There is no universal Church Hymn of the Day selection. There is some history to some hymns being used on certain days or with certain Gospels, but it's hardly at the level of catholic norm.

Luther's hymn is beautiful and Scriptural, but so is Tiefel's. The melody of Luther's hymn is frankly unknown in (dare I say?) the majority of WELS churches. It can and should be taught and appreciated. But without such teaching, a pastor will have a hard time simply putting it on the hymn list.

And the supplemental lectionary cannot be considered sectarian. It retains all the Gospels for every Sunday, which is the heart of the Lectionary. Of course, one might make the argument that the Three-Year Lectionary itself was an unwise move away from the historic lectionary, but that'll have to wait till another day.

If we want to talk sectarian, let's talk abandoning the lectionary (or any lectionary) entirely and copying the sects' topical-only each-man-for-himself readings.

Post a Comment

Comments will be accepted or rejected based on the sound Christian judgment of the moderators.

Since anonymous comments are not allowed on this blog, please sign your full name at the bottom of every comment, unless it already appears in your identity profile.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License