(click on the image to enlarge)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License
May 20, 2015
Bible Readers Prefer ‘Sacred Dialect’ Over ‘Contemporary Language’Sep 03, 2014
2013 WELS Convention and the Endorsement of NIV 2011Aug 01, 2013
WELS Resolution on Bible TranslationsAug 05, 2013
Post-Modern Language Games: Effecting more than just the Perversion of Bible Translations and the Corruption of Christian TheologyJuly 22, 2013
LCMS Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR) recommends against NIV 2011Jan 9, 2013
The Queen James Bible: The next stage of "interpretive ambiguity"Dec 14, 2012
How does one interpret language in a post-Modern Age? What about the language of the Bible?Dec 11, 2012
"Church and Continuity" Conference Review: Rev. Koester on Gender Neutral TranslatingJun 5, 2012
NIV Translation Posts CompiledJan 6, 2012
ELS doctrine committee recommends against NIV 2011Dec 7, 2011
The LORD (no longer) Our Righteousness in NIV 2011Nov 30, 2011
"Relevance," and Mockery of the Holy MartyrsNov 30, 2011
The Gender Gutting of the Bible in NIV 2011Nov 28, 2011
On "Emasculated Bibles" and being "Objective"Nov 15, 2011
The Case of the Disappearing "Testament:" Modern Bible Translations and Covenantal TheologyOct 15, 2011
Thoughts on Gender-Neutral Language in the NIV 2011Sep 15, 2011
Post-Modernism, Pop-culture, Transcendence, and the Church MilitantSep 13, 2011
"The saints" are no moreAug 15, 2011
The NIV 2011 and the Importance of Translation IdeologyAug 02, 2011
The NNIV, the WELS Translation Evaluation Committee, and the Perspicuity of the ScripturesJuly 28, 2011
NIV 2011: A brotherly debateJuly 27, 2011
NNIV - the new standard for WELS?July 15, 2011
Anti-Semitic Sensitivity in the New NIVDecember 15, 2010
NIV2011 comparison with NIV1984 and TNIV(links to Slowley analysis)
MORE NIV2011 comparisons with NIV1984 and TNIV(links to Dyer analysis)
Note: Intrepid Lutherans cannot endorse all the content found at the following links, and expects that the visitor accessing them will exercise mature Berean judgment in assessing and making use of them.
LINKS TO LUTHERAN CHURCH BODIES
10 comments:
Curious why the Protes'tant Conference doesn't show up...
Joe K.
I have one like that including other Lutheran church bodies. I couldn't figure out how to put it in this post, so here it is on a hosting site (png format):
http://www.mediafire.com/?pkd4gy9gkdeu84q
The General Synod didn't divide into General Council and Synod of the South. Those respective groups did break off of the General Synod, but the General Synod itself continued to exist, and was also a part of the United Lutheran Church in America merger in 1918. And there were quite a few more regional synods besides the Pennsylvania Ministerium, the New York Ministerium, and the Maryland-Virginia Synod (not "Ministerium") that comprised the General Synod. The (Swedish) Augustana Synod also was a part of the General Council until 1918. It's difficult to portray all this in a chart, since these were essentiually loose federations of autonomous synods, and not structured church bodies. Also, the Illinois Synod, the English Synod of Missouri, and the (Finnish) National Evangelical Lutheran Church united with the Missouri Synod at different times in Missouri's history. It wasn't just the Slovak Synod that did this. What's a bit more surprising in this chart is the lack of showing the three previously independent synods that united to comprise what is now the WELS: the original Wisconsin Synod of 1850, the Michigan Synod, and the Minnesota Synod.
Yes, I think that there are a few things that could be corrected and/or added. The Tennesee Synod is listed under Ohio Synod, but I am fairly certain that they remained independant and eventually joined the Missouri Synod as a "non-geographical district" -- the English District. Also missing is the Nebraska Synod, which separated from the Wisconsin Synod and rejoined later.
As long as we're mentioning the Prots'tant Conference, there are a few smaller American Lutheran church bodies which exist today that are missing as well. The AALC, which left the "ELCA" prior to amalgamation, and currently is in fellowship with the LCMS, is missing, and the church body that separated from them, the LMS-USA, is also missing. The ELCM, a "centrist" Lutheran body that separated from the ELCA, is missing. There is the LCR, which separated from LCMS in the 1960's over Church and Ministry, which is missing. I know that there is at least one confessing "Hauge Synod" congregation left, a rural church in the Mondovi, WI area. Speaking of pietists, there are also the Latvian Lutherans in America, which are not listed in the diagram. And don't forget ELDoNA... There are quite a number of "independant" Lutherans and micro-synods who either separated from or have remained separate from other Lutherans for doctrinal reasons. It can be hard to keep track of them all. But I'm sure that was not the purpose for creating the chart above... It does demonstrate the complex pedigree of Lutheranism in America.
Many thanks to Mr. Lund for sharing his chart, and encouragement to continue to modify it as he encounters new facts.
Actually, Doug, you don't have this exactly right either. The Tennessee Synod did not eventually unite with the Missouri Synod. It became a part of the United Synod in the South, which then became a part of the ULCA in 1918. It was the English Synod of Missouri - which originally had some pastors who came out of the Tennessee Synod - that became a non-geographical district of Missouri in 1911.
The absolute best resource for anyone who is trying to unravel all this would be Historical Guide to Lutheran Church Bodies of North America, published in 1998 by the Lutheran Historical Conference. I would suggest that Mr. Lund try to get a copy of this, and then see if he can figure out a way to summarize all of it on a chart! And I'd wish him good luck!!
Yeah... I think I let on that I wasn't 100% certain of that. Thanks for the correction!
Thank you for the encouragement to continue to modify and correctly depict Lutheranism via the chart. As Pastor Webber said, the task is made difficult by the loose associations across multiple organizations.
I have a PDF of "A Brief History of the Lutheran Church in America" by Neve and will also follow up on the "Historical Guide". As a project, I find myself diving into it for a week, than waiting a year and getting reengaged in the research. Its a starting point.
Blessings to all of you.
I don't know if you've already seen it or consulted it, but somewhere in the library at the Seminary in Mequon there is a bulletin board sized chart similar to the one you prepared. It was done by hand as a project by someone (I don't know who or when).
It'll be a little out of date, since it was there already in the lower level of the library in one of the conference rooms in 2002-2006 when I was there, but it might be a resource to consult.
Grace and peace,
Benjamin Tomczak
Naval gazing...let's get to something more relevant...
Joe Krohn
Joe,
Sorry to hear you're naval gazing. Happy Thanksgiving anyway!
Post a Comment
Comments will be accepted or rejected based on the sound Christian judgment of the moderators.
Since anonymous comments are not allowed on this blog, please sign your full name at the bottom of every comment, unless it already appears in your identity profile.